Government-operated gambling Essay Example for Free

Government-operated manoeuvre EssayOver the other(prenominal) few years, judicature operated shimmer has gr protest into a massive business, in that location has been untold controversy around the topic of weather or non Gambling should be regulated. In this essay I for use up explain my point of view on this topic and give examples that bide my ideas. So, what should the states policy towards looseness? I believe that the state should not regulate swordplay be bugger off of three main reasons. My first reason is batchs rights and freedoms. Second, Gambling has grown into a major(ip) industry over the pas few years the centre for addiction and mental health stated in their Gambling Policy framework in 2011 Government-operated playing period has steadily expanded in Ontario in the past two decades, r til nowues reaching $4. 7 billion in 2009. (2). This shows that Gambling has grown to become a major industry in todays economy and by doing so it has attended socie ty in some(prenominal) different aspects, the growth of the gambling industry has idle words to an increase in gross for the judicature, thus expirationing in more favorable benefits towards the familiar.Finally, The gambling industry has lead to umteen job opportunities in north America, pass a beacon of hope to those in need of jobs during a inlet. In modern society, freedom is not only supported tho in any case cherished, volume should be given the freedom to bouncy their lives as they please, weather they choose to live their lives in a healthy way or not that is up to them. However, they must be given the right to live as they please. In the United States, groups such as the KKK ar protected under the first amendment, which protects their freedom of speech, no matter how ludicrous it may be, they assume the right to say as they please.The same should be applied to life. People should have the survival to live their lives as they please without being watched ov er by the politics. Since gambling does require participants to be of legal age, we have a go at it that the people gambling are adults. These grown ups should be able to have meet over their own lives, its their responsibility to understand the chances they are taking when gambling. Some may argue that certain people cannistert control their gambling troubles and have gotten too addicted to gambling and that casinos take advantage of these people.These claims are supported by some statistics given in the centre for addiction and mental health, which states, it is estimated that between 30% and 40% of Ontarios gambling taxs come from the 3% of the population with gambling problems (2). This statistic shows that the gambling industry does to a great extent depend of the people addicted to the game. I would respond by expressing two points. First, the people with gambling problems of which they cannot control are a minority, in Jonathan Wolffs Ethics and public policy A Philoso phical doubtfulness, the author states that between 0.6 and 0.8 of the UK adult population could be classified as problem gambles (59). Furthermore, in the centre for addiction and mental healths Gambling Policy framework in 2011 that fairish over 3% of the provinces population experiences moderate to arrant(a) gambling problems. (57). These numbers do not justify having to discipline an entire industry that would affect hundreds of thousands of people that work in it and do their living off jobs in that industry.Second, increasing government regulations on casinos and lotteries will not stop these problem gamblers from gambling. Jonathan Wolff states in the late 1950s there were towns about 25 percent of the adult population gambled illegitimately on a regular basis. (55). Taking this point into perspective, it could be inferred that if the government increases the regulations on legal casinos and lotteries that would strive it harder for people with an addiction to gamble, t hese people will find other ways to feed their addiction.This is a severe problem because when these people begin to gamble hotly they will put their money into other illegal activities, which could include drugs, weapons or violence. In fact, legion(predicate) large gangs could use this opportunity to fund their illegal activities, which would lead to more trouble in society another(prenominal) point to be do towards this issue would be that of money, not only would these gamblers be putting their lives at risk when gambling illegally and dealing with gangs, but they could also be keeping this money out of the governments hand which could go government programs to help the less fortunate.This brings me to my next point and that is that gambling has become a major source of receipts for the government. Government regulated gambling has grown into a massive industry which generates a significant bill of revenue each year of which most ends up in the government as funding for man y different organizations. in the paper named Gambling Its Pleasure and costs by Lorne Tepperman it states that The industry groups report says 57 per cent of gambling revenue $8. 7 billion- supported government services and charities. (9). Tepperman also states that gambling is the most financially significant (9) segment in entertainment and that it contributes $15. 3 billion a year to the economy, according to the Canadian Gaming Association. (9). Ronald Pavalko also states in his paper titled gambling and public policy State revenues from casino taxes totaled nearly $3. 5 billion. (336). The reality is that today, we are in a recession we cant afford to decrease that revenue by implementing harsh restrictions on gambling.It is argued that even though gambling is a major source of revenue for the government, it is also a source of stroke for people with gambling addictions. The centre for Addiction and Mental health states that For these individuals, a range of harms may occ ur, resulting in heavy social, economic, and health costs such as crime, dysfunctional relationships, and bankruptcy. (2). However, the solution to this problem is not adding restrictions to gambling but is actually using the money made from gambling towards a better cause.As I have previously stated, people addicted to gambling will not be cured from their addiction by regulating legal gambling because they will find other means to feed their addiction. I believe that the best solution to these peoples gambling problem would be using the revenue that they generate for the government in taxes could be used to spend a penny social programs for people with serious addictions to gambling that would help them quit.I believe this solution would be ideal because the minority of people with gambling addictions will be treated in a proper healthy way in order to get over their addiction, the left over revenue could chill out be used in other social programs and finally, the money and pro fit that the casinos and lotteries generate will still flow which would result in more jobs, another source of income to the economy and would prevent people from getting fired from their jobs if harsh restrictions were to be applied to gambling agencies.My final argument for this essay is that of employment. As previously stated, gambling generates a huge amount of revenue for the government, Gambling is a growing industry and with its growth it creates several opportunities for jobs for people in need. Gambling generates many jobs that help the economy grow in this time of need. Gambling generates jobs of all sorts, from the engineers and architects that build and design the casinos, to the people who sell lottery tickets, to those who actually work in casinos.All of these people generate their income because of the gambling industry. Tepperman states that in Canada gambling accounts for 267,000 full time jobs. (6). Pavalko also states in his paper that in only eleven states a to tal of 370,207 people are employed in casinos, In a country with a catamenia unemployment rate of 8%, the Gambling industry should be seen as a source for solutions to a much more serious problem than an addiction to gambling. Expanding the gambling industry will in return create more job opportunities and help decrease the unemployment rate dramatically.However, if the government begins to set harsher policies towards gambling and casinos are unavoidable to cut costs, the unemployment rate might increase which would create even more social issue, which could result in protests and riots from the workers who have disconnected their jobs due to the harsh policy towards gambling. Some might argue that Gambling still creates harm towards many people and even though it can create jobs it can also result in many people losing their jobs. I would respond by quoting Lorne Tepperman A majority of adults gamble creditworthy only a small minority of the population experiences gambling rela ted harm. (1). I believe that gambling will create more jobs that it will end and that that is just a minor side force out that could be easily cured by the revenue that gambling will generate for the government, this money could be put back into society and produce new projects that create new job opportunities and these jobs could be offered to those who had lost their previous jobs. In conclusion I would say that I do not believe that the government should regulate gambling because of the reasons that I have stated earlier in this essay.First, Gambling is a choice and freedom. It a civil right and the government should not be able to decide weather or not you are allowed to gamble or how much you are allowed to gamble. Second, Gambling has grown into a major industry and has become a major source of revenue to the government. Gambling has helped fund many government programs used to help the less fortunate, even though gambling does create certain people who are addicted to it, they are nowhere near as many as the people whom gambling helps.In this situation the pros drastically outweigh the cons and as previously stated, the revenue generated from gambling could go towards social programs made to help people with gambling addictions, that way these people will eventually cure themselves of their addiction and the hundreds of thousands of people whom depend on gambling a source of income would not be affected, which is what I believe is a win-win situation. This brings me to my final argument, employment.The gambling industry has created hundreds of thousands of job opportunities to many of those who need it, especially in a recession where millions struggle to find an income support for them and their families. I would say that the government should encourage gambling businesses to grow. However, as Christiane Pouline states in his paper titled Gambling that Decisions on policy pertaining to gambling need to be based on a full accounting of the health, ec onomic and social benefits and costs of gambling. (1208). Which is why the policy towards gambling should be set to help both the gambler and the Casinos. That policy should state that a majority of the profit that is generated from Casinos should go towards social programs that will benefit society these social programs should include programs made to help gambling addicts with their problems. throng Doughney perfectly sums up this policy in his book titled The poker machine state.Doughney says, enterprise to do good but even when you cannot at least do not knowingly cause harm. (1). Over the past several years, gambling has grown into the largest sector of the entertainment industry, creating the most amount of revenue to the government. Our society should be scared of this phenomenon and try to regulate it, we should actually take advantage of it and use it to help make the most the most of this opportunity by using the money made from gambling to make better our lives and the lives of those around us.